[expand]
Resistance Symbol
As Christianity spread, hammer amulets increased in certain regions—suggesting they functioned as resistance symbols, declarations that wearer maintained traditional beliefs despite royal Christian policy. The hammer became rallying symbol for those resisting religious change.
This resistance was not always successful. Many who wore hammers eventually converted or were compelled to convert. But the period when hammer amulets flourished shows that conversion was gradual, contested process, not instant transformation. People clung to Thor even as Christ’s influence grew.
Syncretism
Some evidence suggests attempted syncretism—people trying to honor both Thor and Christ, wearing both hammers and crosses, invoking both gods depending on situation. This practical polytheism made sense to people who understood different powers as having different jurisdictions, different strengths, different appropriate invocations.
The church ultimately rejected this syncretism—demanding exclusive loyalty, prohibiting invocation of Thor alongside Christ, declaring hammer amulets as signs of damnable idolatry. But the popular desire to hedge spiritual bets, to maintain access to multiple sources of protection, shows pragmatic religious sensibility that differed from official theological positions.
Final Displacement
By 12th century, hammer amulets largely disappeared from archaeological record. Christianity had triumphed, Thor was relegated to folklore and literary tradition, the hammer became symbol of past rather than living religious practice. The physical disappearance of hammer amulets marks end of Norse traditional religion as publicly practiced faith.
But the symbol persisted in folklore, in place names (numerous locations named for Thor), in idioms and expressions, in cultural memory. The hammer was defeated but not completely erased, surviving in forms that Christianity could not entirely suppress.
[/expand]