[expand]
When a killing occurred, both families faced immediate crisis. The killer’s family knew they must either raise the weregild or prepare for war. The victim’s family knew they must either accept compensation or pursue revenge, understanding that revenge would likely cost additional lives, create new obligations, potentially destroy both families through cascading violence. Neither choice was simple. Both required consultation, negotiation, assessment of resources and resolve.
The families typically requested Thing mediation, seeking neutral ground where tempers might cool, where community elders could speak, where the weight of collective judgment might prevent the worst outcomes. The Thing meeting occurred at the sacred assembly place, often weeks or months after the killing, allowing time for initial rage to subside, for both families to consider their positions, for intermediaries to begin negotiating possible settlements.
At the Thing, the killer’s family formally acknowledged the death and offered to pay weregild. The victim’s family could accept, reject, or negotiate. If they accepted, the price was agreed upon and payment schedule established—large weregilds were often paid over years, requiring the killer’s family to provide hostages guaranteeing they would fulfill their obligation. If they rejected, they declared blood feud, making clear their intention to pursue revenge through violence. The community recorded this declaration, understanding that whatever violence followed was now sanctioned, that both families had chosen war over peace.
[/expand]