[expand]
Runic literacy was restricted but not extremely rare—more people could read runes than could write them, the recognition being easier than execution, the functional literacy being adequate for system’s purposes even when universal literacy was absent.
The carvers were specialists—people who had mastered the technical skills of neat, legible carving, who understood runic orthography, who could translate spoken words into appropriate runic forms. The carver was commissioned when inscription was needed, paid for services, sometimes traveled between communities providing carving skills to those who lacked them locally. The specialization was professional rather than priestly, the rune carver being craftsperson comparable to smith or carpenter rather than religious figure.
The readers were more numerous—people who recognized runes, who could puzzle out inscriptions, who understood what common formulaic texts meant. The functional literacy allowed property identification, permitted reading common memorial inscriptions, enabled basic communication through carved messages. The ability to read did not require ability to write—recognizing carved characters was different skill from executing them neatly, the passive literacy being sufficient for most purposes.
The oral culture remained primary—the runes supplemented rather than replaced verbal communication, memory, and oral tradition. The important information was memorized, the significant events were preserved through repeated telling, the genealogies and histories existed in specialist’s memory rather than in written records. The runes marked what needed permanent physical presence—ownership claims, memorial stones, boundary markers—but they did not become vehicle for extensive record-keeping or literary composition that characterized Mediterranean literacy.
[/expand]