[expand]Modern Baltic peoples may no longer maintain sacred groves where major festivals occur under ancient oaks, may no longer leave elaborate offerings at forest springs, may no longer fear lauma or seek kaukas assistance. But the underlying principle survives in environmental consciousness, in forest protection laws, in cultural identity connected to landscape’s sacred character.
The forest remains. It still harbors old oaks descended from trees that witnessed pre-Christian ceremonies. It still contains springs that provided water for offerings and purification. It still shelters rare species that benefited from sacred grove protection. Whether these locations are sacred because spirits dwell there or whether the preservation mechanisms happened to produce ecological benefits, the result is identical: certain forests survived where they might have been destroyed, certain resources remained available where they might have been exhausted, certain relationships between humans and landscape continued where they might have been severed.
The forest stands as temple without walls.
Spirits dwell in oak and spring and stone.
Offerings acknowledge what humans do not own.
And the sacred groves remember ancient protocols.
[/expand]