[expand]
Christianity viewed sigrblót with horror—human sacrifice was abomination, animal sacrifice was unnecessary (Christ’s sacrifice having fulfilled all such requirements), and the transactional relationship with gods was heretical (proper relationship was submission to divine will, not negotiation for specific outcomes).
The Suppression:
Christian rulers banned sigrblót—making practice illegal, punishing those who performed it, working to eliminate these observances from military culture. The suppression was partly successful—human sacrifice largely ended (or went deeply underground), public animal sacrifices decreased, the explicit invocation of war gods was replaced with prayers to Christian God and saints.
The Persistence:
Yet the practice persisted in modified forms—soldiers continued making pre-battle offerings (now framed as donations to church rather than sacrifices to gods), commanders continued seeking supernatural favor (now through priests performing mass rather than goðar performing blót), armies continued interpreting omens and dreams as divine communications (now attributed to Christian God rather than Odin).
The underlying logic—that divine favor could be sought, that proper observances affected battle outcomes, that supernatural assistance was available and necessary—survived religious transformation. Only the specific gods being petitioned changed, not the fundamental approach to relationship between human warriors and supernatural powers.
[/expand]