[expand]
Christianity brought baptismal naming that conflicted with traditional practices in multiple ways. The Church insisted that naming should occur shortly after birth (to ensure the child died baptized if early death occurred), while Germanic tradition preferred waiting period. Christian names should invoke saints rather than gods or ancestors. The ceremony should occur in church under clerical authority rather than at family shrines or sacred groves.
The conflict played out through compromise and resistance. Some families performed traditional naming privately, then brought the child to church for baptismal naming that satisfied Christian requirements. The child received two names—one from tradition that family used, one from Church that appeared in official records.
The Church attempted to suppress the waiting period, arguing that unbaptized infants who died went to limbo rather than heaven. This created genuine pastoral crisis for families torn between traditional caution and Christian urgency. Some adopted rapid baptism while maintaining other elements of traditional naming. Others delayed baptism, accepting the theological risk for sake of traditional practice.
Over time, Christian naming largely displaced traditional ceremonies, though folk practices persisted—the careful selection of names for their meanings, the involvement of godparents who functioned similarly to traditional sponsors, the recognition that naming was serious business requiring proper ritual rather than casual designation.
[/expand]