[expand]
What made danegeld significant was its demonstration that violence was economic tool—not simply expression of rage or territorial ambition but calculated means for extracting wealth, activity where costs and benefits could be assessed, opportunity that could be rationally exploited or avoided based on circumstances.
The system worked because both sides made pragmatic calculations—payers assessed whether fighting or paying was preferable, raiders determined whether payment or plunder was more profitable, the negotiations occurred within framework of mutual understanding about costs, benefits, alternatives. The violence or threat thereof was not irrational but instrumental, serving economic purposes that could be satisfied through payment as well as through actual combat.
The ship arrives with threat implicit.
The silver changes hands to prevent violence.
The raiders depart without drawing weapons.
And economics, properly understood, includes threat and payment as alternative currencies.
[/expand]